Refine your search:     
Report No.
 - 
Search Results: Records 1-8 displayed on this page of 8
  • 1

Presentation/Publication Type

Initialising ...

Refine

Journal/Book Title

Initialising ...

Meeting title

Initialising ...

First Author

Initialising ...

Keyword

Initialising ...

Language

Initialising ...

Publication Year

Initialising ...

Held year of conference

Initialising ...

Save select records

JAEA Reports

None

; Tokizawa, Takayuki; *; Nagara, Shuichi*

JNC TY6400 2000-014, 39 Pages, 2000/05

JNC-TY6400-2000-014.pdf:1.35MB

None

JAEA Reports

Feasibility study on magnetic separation

Oda, Yoshihiro; Funasaka, Hideyuki; Wang, X.*; Obara, Kenji*; Wada, Hitoshi*

JNC TY8400 2000-002, 47 Pages, 2000/03

JNC-TY8400-2000-002.pdf:2.53MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

None

*; *

JNC TJ8420 2000-013, 96 Pages, 2000/03

JNC-TJ8420-2000-013.pdf:6.04MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

None

*; *; *; *

JNC TJ3410 2000-021, 73 Pages, 2000/03

JNC-TJ3410-2000-021.pdf:52.78MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

None

*; *; *; *

JNC TJ3410 2000-020, 80 Pages, 2000/03

JNC-TJ3410-2000-020.pdf:41.34MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

The development of general assessment system for FBR cycle for practical use

Shiba, Tsuyoshi*; Kamezaki, Hiroshi*; Yuyama, Tomonori*; *

JNC TJ9400 2000-012, 92 Pages, 2000/02

JNC-TJ9400-2000-012.pdf:3.18MB

This research aims to develop a system in which aspects necessary for FBR cycle and overall comparison of evaluation items (economy, safety etc.) are evaluated quantitatively and objectively as a part of Nuclear Cycle development's research project of the FBR cycle for practical use. There are various methods in the decision-making support. In this particular situation, features of each method were evaluated based on the analysis of cases with each method. Subsequently we constructed overall evaluation method by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Multi-attribution Utility Function Method (MUF) and Cut-off Method. This method has variation in evaluation items, transparency in evaluation process and uncompensation. The six aspects of evaluation are economy, effectiveness of resource use, proliferation resistance, environmental effectiveness, safety, and research and development. The evaluation items and the evaluation index of each aspect were hierarchized and the evaluation structure was constructed. In the present study effect function for each evaluation index and pair comparison for examining significance of each item were utilized to select prospective systems for FBR cycle experimentally. The result confirmed reliability of our general assessment system as a decision-making support system for FBR system.

JAEA Reports

None

*

JNC TJ7420 2000-001, 14 Pages, 2000/02

JNC-TJ7420-2000-001.pdf:0.27MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

None

Tokizawa, Takayuki

JNC TN6450 99-001, 39 Pages, 1999/01

JNC-TN6450-99-001.pdf:1.85MB

8 (Records 1-8 displayed on this page)
  • 1